ESG vs. Gastric Sleeve: Which Is Right for You?
For individuals struggling with obesity, finding an effective solution to achieve significant weight loss and improve their overall health is often a top priority. Two popular weight loss procedures that have gained widespread attention are the Traditional Gastric Sleeve and the Endoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, also known as an ESG for short. While both surgeries aim to help individuals shed excess pounds and improve their quality of life, they have distinct differences in terms of procedure, recovery, and long-term outcomes. At Streamline, not only do we offer traditional Gastric Sleeve surgery, but we also offer the less-invasive alternative – the Endoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
In this blog, we will explore the key differences between the ESG and the Gastric Sleeve to help you make an informed decision if you’re considering weight loss surgery.
Understanding the Procedures
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (ESG):
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy is considered a less invasive alternative in comparison to traditional weight loss procedures such as gastric sleeve surgery. It may be suitable for individuals who are overweight/moderately obese and have tried other weight loss strategies, such as diet and exercise alone, and have not been successful.
Traditional Gastric Sleeve:
The Gastric Sleeve is a surgical weight loss procedure that involves the permanent removal of a large portion of the stomach in order to help individuals lose weight and improve their health. It is a common and effective surgery option for those struggling with obesity and related health conditions. However, it is not without risks and potential complications, and individuals should undergo a thorough medical evaluation and engage in discussions with healthcare professionals to determine if it is the right option for their specific needs and circumstances.
A comparison between ESG and the Gastric Sleeve:
Surgical Approach:
ESG– With no stomach incisions, Endoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy is a minimally invasive, outpatient procedure where a small camera and instruments are inserted through the mouth and down the throat to the stomach. The surgeon then uses the endoscope to create small folds or sutures in the stomach, whilst leaving the remaining stomach in place, meaning that the procedure is reversible – unlike the traditional gastric sleeve where part of the stomach is physically removed. This reduces its capacity and restricts food intake.
Gastric Sleeve– The Gastric Sleeve is a surgical procedure that is conducted by keyhole surgery to remove 90% of the stomach, changing the stomach to a narrow tube approximately 1cm in diameter. This ultimately reduces the stomach’s capacity and results in significant weight loss.
Recovery:
ESG-The recovery period for the ESG is typically faster than the Gastric Sleeve. Most patients can return to their regular activities within a few days.
Gastric Sleeve– Recovery time for the Gastric Sleeve is longer and may require a hospital stay. Patients are gradually introduced to a liquid diet and then progress to soft and solid foods as their body heals. Patients typically need several weeks to resume normal activities.
Weight Loss and Effectiveness:
ESG: Although ESG can lead to significant weight loss, the extent of weight loss may vary from person to person. It is considered effective for some individuals, especially those with moderate obesity.
Gastric Sleeve: The Gastric Sleeve is known for producing significant and sustainable weight loss results. It is often recommended for individuals with severe obesity.
Complications and Risks:
ESG: ESG patients may experience mild nausea and abdominal discomfort for a week after the procedure.The ESG is generally considered safe and may have fewer complications compared to traditional gastric sleeve surgery. However, potential risks and complications still exist, and they should be discussed with a healthcare professional.
Gastric Sleeve: The Gastric Sleeve carries a range of potential complications, including infection, bleeding, leaks, and long-term nutritional deficiencies. The most serious complication is a leak from the staple line, which occurs in between 1 and 3% of patients
.
Considerations for Choosing the Right Procedure
- BMI: Your BMI and overall health will play a crucial role in determining which procedure is right for you. The Gastric Sleeve is often recommended for individuals with a higher BMI or more severe obesity, whilst the ESG may be suitable for those with a lower BMI or a preference for less invasive surgery.
- Recovery Time: Consider how much time you can dedicate to recovery. The ESG offers a quicker recovery period, which may be appealing if you have work or other commitments that can’t be put on hold.
- Long-Term Goals: Think about your long-term weight loss and health goals. If you’re looking for rapid and substantial weight loss with potentially greater health benefits, the Gastric Sleeve may be the better choice. However, if you prioritise a less invasive procedure with a quicker recovery, ESG might be suitable.
Both the ESG and the Gastric Sleeve are effective weight loss procedures, each with its own set of advantages and considerations. The right choice for you depends on your individual circumstances, including your BMI, recovery expectations, and long-term goals. It’s essential to consult with a qualified healthcare professional who can assess your specific situation and provide guidance on which procedure is the most suitable path to achieving your weight loss and health objectives. Ultimately, whether you choose the ESG or the Gastric Sleeve, both can be life-changing tools in your journey toward a healthier, more fulfilling life.
Remember when considering either of these options it is important to seek advice from an expert weight loss clinical team. They will be able to advise you on your best treatment option, as well as any risks or complications. If you’re ready to take the next steps to achieving significant weight loss, call us on 0333 016 3030 or fill out the form on our website to schedule your FREE virtual consultation.